Creating Centres of Excellence - a sound philosophy?

Approach

Services

Clients

Knowledgebase

Contact us

Dating back to the mid-nineties the UK Government essentially 'led the charge' in setting a trend of establishing corporate centres of excellence (COE) in the discipline of project, programme and portfolio delivery. However the original concept, 'borrowed' from academia, sports and medical environments was adapted; rather than identifying and promoting best practice the primary thrust (according to the OGC pocket book) was to provide 'oversight, scrutiny and challenge'.

Now, nearly twenty years later, it may be timely to review whether the considerable investment is yielding an appropriate return. It would probably be equally useful to discuss, if not set, the agenda going forward.

Centres of excellence

Conceptually creating centres of excellence is simple; a focal point for the assessment, capture and sharing of the best of practices available in the discipline area with the intent of driving overall performance up. This is how world records keep getting broken and pioneering surgical techniques advance; 'top-slicing' talent rather than 'bottom-slicing' incompetence is the aim of effective COEs.

The difficulty is translating this ambition into practical day-to-day activity - who does what and under what authority? In providing guidance on this the Cabinet Office focused predominantly on the audit and review process offered under the aegis of the Gateway Review scheme. Whilst mention was made of improving delivery capability and performance this was relegated to a phase two activity once the COE had established a sound footing of review.

Sadly audit and review, the dominant themes of the Gateway process, do not add value; they simply guard against it being lost by reducing the likelihood of 'downstream' failure. To add value it is necessary to improve inputs to a process in advance rather than inspect the consequences post process. Outside the P3M community COEs that flourish identify best practice, analyse it and then effectively embed this into the future process - this is not about stopping failure but aggrandising success; growing excellence.

Arguably this is something that the phase one COEs were ill-equipped to achieve. The question remains; how many have effectively transitioned into phase two and started to realise their potential?

Whats working?

The main thrust of the original OGC remit, by some considerable way, was the introduction of a range of reviews. These have been widely adopted and have, doubtless (despite several high profile examples) reduced the tax-payers' burden of cost in failed projects and programmes. Some have even moved visibly towards the attainment of phase two type capability improvement among the P3M community. We are eager to identify and discuss the promoters and inhibitors of this transition.

Whats not?

What still seem to be absent are any clear paragons of excellence. Have we seen a COE that has identified 'best in breed' practices and behaviours and established a reliable mechanism to disseminate them, effectively, into the wider corporate or national P3M community? If you can talk, from experience, about capturing such rewards you will have a keen audience.


Patrick BoulterNick Dobson
Managing Consultant


Nick Dobson

Nick Dobson

I enjoy helping individuals at all organisational levels to review and positively modify beliefs and behaviours
Discover more...

Share this?You may also be interested in...

Capability or capacity which one has your attention

Capability or capacity which one has your attention

Capability without adequate capacity is a recipe for stress and frustrated ambition - senior managers see their strategies fail in the fight for scarce resources as work queues grow and grow. Capacity without appropriate...
Discover more...
What do constraints tell us about success

What do constraints tell us about success

Do you still believe that performance within the triple constraints of time, cost and quality are how success should be judged?
Discover more...
The empty chair part two

The empty chair part two

Following on from the Empty Chair Part One, we thought it might be helpful to formalise the thinking and suggest some of the approaches that might work in addressing the problem of the absent sponsor.
Discover more...

Share this?Share this?

Share on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TwitterShare on Google+